Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 [200] 300 400 500 |
3981. Blasters, artillery and more - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Zenst So is that officialy an expliot (announcment) or have you just told everybody how to be uber in a moro's now? If you can clarify please as atm I see a world of pain given the cat is out of the bag! The module isn't...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 21:37:00
|
3982. TUX : Fair NOS change? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Smokeyser I agree with Justice here. A frigate planning to tackle a BS is like a mosquito planning to tackle an elephant. There's simply no way the bug can be expected to survive. All it takes is one little flip of the eleph...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 21:27:00
|
3983. TUX : Fair NOS change? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 16/05/2006 20:55:41 Justice Bringer, nice red herring there. There is a VAST difference between a highslot module - which has to be balanced agaisnt other highslot modules, with which it directly competes for fitting ...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:55:00
|
3984. A further proposition for AFs (PvP balancing in mind) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Some inties used to have RoF bonuses. This was causing server issues. So they changed it to RoF. So yes, several inties DO have double damage bonuses (inc. the Tarranis). There was a 4th bonus also added, but one which is not of stellar usage - f...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:50:00
|
3985. Ok Amarr players at a serious disadvantage (not ranting) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Emperor D'Hoffryn Simplest solution is to just switch agents to one that will give you Sansha missions Or Bloods, for that matter. "The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but ...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:48:00
|
3986. A further proposition for AFs (PvP balancing in mind) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Deathbarrage imo all that needs to be changed is give them the 2nd bonus of their t1 counterpart Then of course you need to give inties a proper 4th bonus rather than the partial one they got, and you need to rebalance b...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:43:00
|
3987. A further proposition for AFs (PvP balancing in mind) - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
They should not be "quick". Neither of their roles requires quickness. Are they too slow for their roles? Perhaps, and a minor weight and speed adjusment would be in order. That would still leave them slower than a T1 frigate, which is fine. They...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:34:00
|
3988. EvE E3 Interview - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 16/05/2006 20:27:54 We're not discussing YOUR ones here, we're discussing future CCP sentry guns. There's no details, and in their abscence we have to go with what is most likely, which is the current gate guns. "The ...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:28:00
|
3989. TUX : Fair NOS change? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Death Merchant Q: How does a frig counter a NOS BS? A: By bringing friends to help. Thank you have a nice day. Because you can use your friends to protect your cap. Oh wait... Thank you, your day was terrible. "Th...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:19:00
|
3990. Capital Ships need to be more 'Capital' - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Zungen then a titan and a mothership should at least have a bonus to tanking or a special rep to use as they have more hp then the ships and a 9800hp repper isnt going to repair much of its base 70k armor as compare to reppe...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:18:00
|
3991. Interdictor Bubble not aggression? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If people CAN use it, they will. That's realism, not pesimish. It's pesimistic if the majority are using it, which at this point they are npt. It's still possible to fix this, in other words, without a huge outcry. "The Human eye is a marvelous d...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:16:00
|
3992. Region structure - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tachy The technical limitations on the servers force ccp to split the cluster into regions. There has to be a few points where pilots and their ships move from one physical/logical computer (node in EVE slang) to the next. ...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:14:00
|
3993. EvE E3 Interview - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Eximius Josari You don't really know much about sentry guns do you. They are not exactly hard to evade or just plain tank/kill. Tanked? Yea, for a Battleship with a tank setup or the right HAC setup. Nothing else. Oh, a...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 20:11:00
|
3994. The Definitive Nighthawk Fix Thread - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tobber Harley defender missiles Right. In utterly lag-free conditions. Uhm... "The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 19:33:00
|
3995. Pandemonium BCS vs BCS II - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: HippoKing i wondered about this since the day t2 BCUs became available. The way i see it, sell them all off before pointing out the error in buying them I did :P "The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very littl...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 19:31:00
|
3996. Pandemonium BCS vs BCS II - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why? Historical inertia. No named BCS for quite some time, then no T2 BCS. They HAVE fallen considerably, and will likely continue to slowly fall. "The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most g...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 19:26:00
|
3997. EvE E3 Interview - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Eximius Josari Originally by: Pesadel0 Originally by: Maya Rkell "They can put up sentry guns and say, "This is our space and nobody else is going to come into it and we are going to run it how we want to" Y...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 19:21:00
|
3998. Kali Features Timeline and Other Stuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Der Ewige Originally by: Maya Rkell *Explination for the entire cynclosure field / you can be shot thing Being destroyable while making a cynocural field is intended. Being not targetable after creating a cynocu...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 19:19:00
|
3999. Just curious, are we still getting Assault Missiles? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Jim Raynor Originally by: Maya Rkell Edited by: Maya Rkell on 16/05/2006 15:10:16 Er...no. I don't see the assualt launcher as a "figh out of water", I see it as a low fitting option for secondary weapons. Yes,...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 15:41:00
|
4000. Just curious, are we still getting Assault Missiles? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 16/05/2006 15:10:16 Er...no. I don't see the assualt launcher as a "figh out of water", I see it as a low fitting option for secondary weapons. Yes, Minmatar Cruisers. A heavy rocket launcher is likely to have a fit...
- by Maya Rkell - at 2006.05.16 15:10:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 [200] 300 400 500 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |